Mark: Summary and Tentative
Conclusions
I call this a tentative conclusions
because with the Gospel and the Spirit there are always new insights,
perspectives and leadings. One can never say the definitive word about the life
of Jesus or the message he preached.
This Gospel has a noticeable lack
of higher Christology and profound theological implications about the identity
of Jesus that takes a major hold of the other Gospels. It seems a simple story,
on of conflict but also of peace.
Jesus came preaching a message:
repent, the kingdom of God is near. I take this to mean turn away from the
direction you are walking which was trespassing on others and walk with Jesus
towards the Kingdom of God. Although the Kingdom of God is not defined, the
manner of walking is. The “walk” means to serve other in word and action. Jesus
main teaching and life example was one of service: healing, exorcism, parables
and teachings. It all spoke of how God desires us to serve others. This
teaching was in conflict with the religion of the day and the power structure
within that religion. The Jewish Law dictated all aspects of life leaving
little room for compassion or even service to others. And the religious leaders
controlled how the Law was interpreted and instituted in daily life. They
controlled the people through their religion. The people were stuck between a
rock and a hard place. Religion squeezed them on one side and the Romans on the
other side. They cried out for a Messiah who would set the religion right and
run the Romans out of town. This Messiah would establish peace where the people
would be free from oppression. But the Messiah who came did not come to
overthrow but rather to preach peace. True peace can only come from the heart,
a heart set free through transformation.
The people turned to Jesus in
faith. His message and his actions demonstrated God’s compassion on the people
and a possible reform of the religion. But held as a king, he might also mean
the end of Roman control. Many flocked to Jesus in expectation. But this Gospel
account does not address those expectations in any terms of fulfillment. Jesus’
message is on of humble servant-hood. Even his disciples, the closest of his
followers, do not fully understand that message. A truly free heart is one that
is bent on service towards others through compassion.
Power structures cannot stand those
who do not play by the rules. Jesus should have turned his crowds and followers
into a rebel army, that would have made sense to the leaders, both religious
and secular. But he did not. And that confounded them. Jesus’ teaching took the
wind out of their sails and was incomprehensible to the power structure. But it
rang with truth to the crowds. Religion will not save you; it will only oppress
you. The state will not save you; it will only oppress you. Salvation, that is
freedom to live, can only come through service to others. If everyone lived by
this code, this way of life, there would be no need for religion or for secular
government. And that would strip them of all their power. In light of this, the
religious leaders knew that Jesus had to die. So they framed him and forced the
secular government to murder Jesus, an innocent man, to maintain their power.
But Jesus knew the outcome of his teachings. Death was not to be feared.
Although the Gospel ends with
Jesus’ death and a surprise ending, an empty tomb, the story continues in
Galilee where Jesus had instructed the Disciples to meet him. What happens
next? This Gospel does not say. We are left wondering with questions. The
implication is if we all follow the teachings of Jesus then we might all go to
the cross for fear of the power structure losing its power. But that would be
the Kingdom of God. A message still very relevant today because it is still
much needed today.