Tuesday, February 25, 2014
Spring Art Show
Here is a drawing I have done for my next art show. The show is in April so I am keeping with a spring theme. It has been refreshing to work on a number of these "spring" drawing in the gloom of winter.
Monday, February 17, 2014
The 50 Dollar Lesson
I have been seeing this picture make its rounds on the
internet at blogs and on Facebook. When I first read it I kind of laughed, had
a typical knee jerk reaction like must stuff on the internet is designed to do,
but then the story stuck with me. I reflected upon the story and the point it
was trying to make. I moved passed my knee jerk reaction and gave it some real
thought. Certainly the little girl’s goals are worthwhile. Certainly we want
the President and the government to be working to overcome such problems as
homelessness and the causes of homelessness such as unemployment,
underemployment, addictions, mental and physical disabilities, and other social
problems. But there is more to the story than what the government can do, the
rest of the story is what I can do. “I” being me, the little girl, the parents,
and the homeless man. Personal responsibility must always play a part in any
social problem. And for some it ends at personal responsibility and for others
it begins with personal responsibility. By that I mean: some say if you were
responsible for yourself you would not end up homeless; others say let us help
you get on your feet so that you can once again become responsible for yourself
and let us teach you how to do that.
Many homeless people suffer from mental issues which make personal responsibility impossible. They do not possess the capability to be responsible for themselves in any meaningful way. If they do not have a support system of family or friends then what happens to them? The government can only do so much. And do you really want that homeless man showing up to mow your lawn?
So the question really is how do we equip these people to be
self-reliant and take on personal responsibility, if it is even possible. And
what do we do with those who will never make it that far?
So all of this was rattling around in my mind and I came up
with a sequel to the above story.
A day later the little girl was at the store with her
parents. She saw the homeless man sitting out front of the store with a little
cardboard sign. She was trying to get up the courage to go tell the man about
her friends who would hire him to mow the lawn to help him not be homeless any longer.
Just when she thought she could do it she saw an elderly couple shuffle over to
the man and start a conversation with him. The couple reached down and helped
the man to his feet. The woman sized him up briefly and then moved off down the
sidewalk and crossed the street. The elderly man took the homeless man’s arm
and escorted him into the store.
The little girl, shopping with her parents, caught a few
peeks of the two men in the store as they moved slowly up and down a few aisles
filling a small basket with a few items. As the little girl and her parents
were leaving the store she saw the woman returning with a bag on one arm. The woman
met the two men as they were also leaving the store. Interested in the whole
scene the girl scooted away from her parents and went to talk with the older
couple.
“Excuse me but are you giving this man a job?” the little
girl asked.
“But maybe soon.” The older man added.
“Then what are you doing?” Asked the girl innocently.
The couple smiled again. The woman spoke again. “We are
giving him some help. Sometimes we all get to a place where we need a little
help. I bought him a change of clothes. New, fresh clothes can be invigorating.”
She held up the bag showing the girl the clothes from the thrift store down the
street.
“And I bought him couple of easy to eat meals. Having a full
belly can give you a new perspective on life.”
“Oh,” the girls responded, “but where are you taking him?”
The old man continued. “Well sometimes new clothes and food
is not enough to get you back on your feet. He has agreed to come with us to a
shelter our church runs. There he can spend a few nights, have a hot shower and
maybe find a little peace. And if he is ready they also offer counseling and
have connection with other organizations which can help him get off the
streets.”
“Being willing to change is the first step though, and he
seems willing today.” The woman added.
“Oh” The parents, who were listening to the whole
conversation, and the little said in unison.
*Instead of Christian you can certainly use the word human.
Personal responsibility is a human trait that goes hand in hand with social responsibility.
Historically, and for me personally, Christians are supposed to be the example
of loving thy neighbor, being the Good Samaritan, and transforming the world
for peace.
Tuesday, February 4, 2014
Tuesday, December 17, 2013
Fiction, non-fiction or ...
We seem to be very dualistic in our thinking. Things are
either fiction or non-fiction. Fiction is all that made up stuff that does not
relate to any fact in any real way, such as the Hobbit, or Cubism. Non-fiction
is all those factual things like science, history or Cubism. Oh wait. I
mentioned Cubism twice. Is art a fiction or a non-fiction? I think in our
attempt at simplistic, black and white thinking, we are overlooking one other
category which is neither fiction nor non-fiction and yet it is both fiction
and non-fiction. That is the category of faith.
But what is faith? Faith is meaning.
Some fiction is just pure entertainment as it should be. But
hidden in that category of fiction are also those pieces which speak to a
deeper level, it brings meaning to life and to the heart and mind. Now you are
moving into faith. When that deeper level is reached it does not mean the
author is a great genius of psychological insights and depth. What it does mean
is that the human experience is such that we share vast amounts of feeling,
insights and thoughts. By tapping into that shared experience, depth is reached
and faith is kept.
Within the realm of fact, or non-fiction, meaning is gleaned
not from the accumulation of data and information, but from understanding.
Understanding needs to develop into wisdom through application. Now you are
moving into faith. When new discoveries force a paradigm shift within the
scientific communities do the old theories then become fictions? Certainly they
are invalidated but they have not lost their meaning. That was one way of
looking at the data set and from it certain conclusions could be deduced, now a
new way is needed to look at the data set which may or may not create new
conclusions. Meaning is maintained. Faith is kept.
Some works are born in faith which straddles the line
between fiction and non-fiction. Any attempt to force them into the category of
non-fiction stripes it of meaning and make it irrelevant. And likewise to push
it towards fiction is to remove the wisdom and understanding that it contains
leaving it empty of value.
For me, the Bible is a book of faith. To attempt to use it
as a guidebook to the past for historical studies removes its meaning and makes
it an empty book. To chalk it all up to works of fiction erases the insights
and meanings which it brings to being human. For me it is not a work of
fiction, nor is it a work of non-fiction. Any facts it contains are incidental
to its meaning. Any stories it contains are not just moralisms, but speak to
real human meaning. It is a work of faith which should bring meaning to one’s
life. To read it any other way is to not understand it.
For me Art is a work of faith. I am creating something real
in a real place at a real time. All of that data about me, my artistic career,
my place in history, etc. can be compiled and biographized and that is not a
bad thing, but it is not my art. Art is not a fiction although it is created
and holds a special place in my being, and perhaps only my being. But it is not
make believe. It is real but not is a scientific, quantifiable way. It is real
in the same way an experience is real. Everyone who rides that roller coaster
leaves with a different experience. And yet it is a shared experience but not
everyone likes it. Art is a faith thing because it transcends fiction and
non-fiction into the realm of meaning, of experience.
Learning to find that place of faith in our dualistic
culture is not easy. Religions turn it into theology and legalistic judgments.
Politics turns it into an “us vs. them” mentality. Science says “this is the
only way it can be.” Faith is meaning and finding that meaning is a personal
quest for each person. Some find it in family, some in sports, some in work,
some in church, some in… well the list can as varied as the population. The
important part is to break the dualistic thinking and realize that faith is not
an either/or proposition but a both/and. Faith is that which brings meaning to
you regardless if you find it in a movie, a book, a lecture, a community or a
political party.
Thursday, November 21, 2013
Leviticus and the Founding Fathers of the USA
I hear people say that we, the United States, were a
Christian nation but at some point we have moved away from the Christian
principles of the founding fathers. I always wonder about the accuracy of that
statement.
I am reading through the Bible for a class. Right now we are
reading Leviticus in the Old Testament, a very dry read. But one passage in particular caught my
attention. Leviticus 19: 33-34.
“When an alien lives with you in your land, do not mistreat him. The
alien living with you must be treated as one of your native-born. Love him as
yourself, for you were aliens in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.”
Wow, that sounds like something Jesus would say. Made me
think “what would the founding fathers
say?”
I imagine they would say something like, “Yep because we are
all aliens here, now if we can only get those damn natives to accept us…”
I think the founding fathers would agree to this biblical ideal and have a very different understand of immigration issue then the ones we have today. I wonder how many Christians are willing to live by this principle of accepting the alien in love and treating them like a native born. Makes one rethink immigration law and such, at least if you are Christian… like the founding fathers…
Sunday, November 10, 2013
Why I support Obamacare
I
am a Christian and I support Obamacare, here is why:
When I first heard about Obamacare and the way it was going
to “force” everyone to buy insurance. I thought “Hell No! The Government does
not have the right to force its citizens to buy anything.” Then I stopped to
think about it for a time. The government does not have any rights. Only People
hold rights and one of the first rights is the right to one’s health.
Governments are only permitted to do what the people allow them to do or are
designed to do through their laws with the consent of the people.
My first Insight
Health Insurance and health care are not synonymous although
they seem to be moving in that direction. At some time in our history Health
Insurance became the gateway to health care. Certainly one can access health
care through emergency situations, but that access route is usually extremely
expensive. But for true health one needs access to routine doctor’s visits,
check ups, medicine and tests on non-emergency bases. Without insurance that is
cost prohibitive. The gateway to the right of healthcare is closed to many
people because insurance companies deny them coverage due to preexisting
conditions or drop their coverage because of chronic problems. That does not
seem right.
My second Insight
Health Insurance companies and many health care providers
are for-profit companies. That means they make a profit from your health, or
sickness. If your health changes in a way that threatens the profit they will
make then they will change or drop your coverage. That is just good business
sense. It also seems wrong. The gateway can suddenly be closed in your face
because of profit margins, especially when you need it most.
My third Insight
If health insurance companies are going to be the gateway to
healthcare, then that gateway needs to be open to everyone, it is their right
of health. But because of the capitalistic, for-profit nature of health
insurance (and healthcare to some extent) then we cannot have a flood a “sick
and needy” people draining the coffers of the insurance companies. If the
government is going to force the insurance companies to accept everyone and
deny no one their right of access to healthcare, then the government need to
require everyone to carry health insurance so that the “presently healthy” can
off set the cost of the “presently sick.” But remember someday you will be the
“sick” and protected from being dropped by your insurance company and somebody
else’s “health” will help to pay for your “cost of sickness.”
Of course the other option is for health insurance companies
to step away from being the gateway to healthcare. What that would look like or
how we would then access healthcare is an open question.
Personal Experience and how it affected my thinking
In the spring of 2007 I had an accident with a power saw and
my knee. The emergency knee surgery cost over $10,000 and of course I was
uninsured. Why would I be? I was young, healthy and did not have extra money
for luxuries like health insurance. I had a few choices to make after the
surgery. I could make payments to the hospital and pay the bill or walk away
and let the hospital try to come after me financially. I paid the bill (With
the help of my lovely wife). Many people decide they cannot afford such
unexpected and costly medical bills and walk away, leaving the hospital to pass
the cost on to other patients or the state. Walking away only raises the cost
for everyone, making it harder for people to access health care.
And of course the next month I found the money to enroll in
health insurance.
In the fall of 2011 while on a trip to Wisconsin my
three-year-old son needed emergency abdominal surgery. After the surgery and a
week in the hospital the bill ran well over $35,000. Thank God we had insurance
and the wonderful hospital in Wisconsin was “in network.” The final cost to us
was in the thousands instead of tens of thousands. It was an unexpected blow
but we were able to handle it.
In the spring of 2012 I became sick. After months of trouble
shooting we figured out that my gall bladder had stopped functioning properly.
It was dead and needed to be removed. Again, thank God I had insurance.
Not one of these cases did we know about ahead of time and
in the midst of it happening if we had tried to get insurance we would have
been denied. Thank God that I had the good sense of enrolling in insurance
after my first accident or today we would be buried under mountains of medical
bills. I am sure that at this point, with our medical history, we are moving
away from a “safe bet” in the insurance actuaries to more of a “risk” for the
insurance companies to keep us insured.
I noticed that on the bills I received from the hospitals
and the insurance claim statements many charges were lowered, dropped or
disallowed by the insurance company. That means insurance companies, because of
their size are able to broker special deals and fee schedules which the
uninsured patient is not. What is the true cost of a gall bladder removal
surgery? The amount billed or the amount paid by the insurance company? No one
knows, not even the hospital.
I realized that the medical industry is not like the auto
mechanic who will give you an estimate that is close to the actual figure and
then get approval for any charges that might be way over the estimate. If you
have a problem, the hospital may give you ball park figure, but they wont know
the full extent of the charges until you are checked out of the hospital. Any
estimate they give you holds no meaning. And you have very little recourse to
fight back. But insurance companies do and can because they are so massive no
little hospital could stand against them.
And that is a good thing and a bad thing. What happens when
insurance companies become so large that no one is accountable? What happens to
the little guys who are stuck between the hospital and the insurance company?
Only some one larger than the insurance companies can stand against the
insurance companies to fight for the little guys, and that would be the
government, with the consent of the people (the little guys).
Through this I realized that with things the way they are in
the health care industry one needs health insurance. But health insurance is
not available to everyone. And it should be.
Tentative Conclusions
Now I have laid all these thoughts out in a very linear
order, but it did not occur that way in my thinking. It was much more jumbled
and disjointed and took a while to work through. This is where my Christian
faith informed me and helped me to see things I would have otherwise pushed
against.
For me, Christianity is expressed through helping your
neighbor. (Of course there is much more to Christianity than that simple
statement, but my theology is not relevant in this case, only my faith in
action.) In the story of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:25-37) we learn that we
are all neighbors to those who are in need, and those in need are our
neighbors. Responding to those in need is our Christian duty. With that outlook
on life then desiring those around me, friends, family, neighbors to have
access to health care makes perfect sense. But it seems the only access they
can have is through health insurance. But some of those people are being denied
health insurance and therefore being denied health care. It is not neighborly,
nor does it sit well with my Christian sensibilities.
And that is why I support Obamacare. It makes me uneasy to
be forced to buy a product or service by any government. But I understand the
economics behind it. If the healthy people who may not need health care are not
paying in to support those who are sick and are drawing against it, then the
whole system will collapse. I feel that since it is a product I am already
buying then I am willing to be “forced” to buy it to guarantee my neighbors, my
friends and my family will have access to it when they need it. I don’t see it
as punishment against the people, but rather a way to regulate the insurance
companies on behalf of the little guys, the people who need to have their right
to health protected. And although the mechanism of the action makes me
uncomfortable, the outcome satisfies my Christian mind and soul.
I know there is much fine print in Obamacare, and I may not
support that whole thing lock, stock and barrel but I agree with the intent.
Now the outcome may not be predicted and I may need to change my mind. But
until we can insure adequate heath care for everyone through some other means I
am willing to give this a go.
If you want to read the Obamacare Bill for yourself you can find it here
New York Times Article link from comments
If you want to read the Obamacare Bill for yourself you can find it here
New York Times Article link from comments
Monday, November 4, 2013
Truth big T or little t
Science searches for truth through facts (data).
Religion (spirituality) searches for truth through meaning.
The truth of science is not the same as the truth of religion.
Data (facts) does not lead to meaning only knowledge.
Meaning does not lead to knowledge only awareness.
When awareness is added to knowledge through reflection, intuition and insights then a greater truth is revealed. A truth that neither science nor religion can capture or reveal on its own. To stay firmly rooted in one position as opposed to the other (science vs. religion) is to deny the full truth and to lead a half life mistaking it for a full life. Knowledge and awareness leads to wisdom which seems to be greatly lacking in both the realms of science and religions. To fight over truth (little t) and yet mistake it for Truth (big T) brings nothing but discord and is as far from wisdom as one can get.
Religion (spirituality) searches for truth through meaning.
The truth of science is not the same as the truth of religion.
Data (facts) does not lead to meaning only knowledge.
Meaning does not lead to knowledge only awareness.
When awareness is added to knowledge through reflection, intuition and insights then a greater truth is revealed. A truth that neither science nor religion can capture or reveal on its own. To stay firmly rooted in one position as opposed to the other (science vs. religion) is to deny the full truth and to lead a half life mistaking it for a full life. Knowledge and awareness leads to wisdom which seems to be greatly lacking in both the realms of science and religions. To fight over truth (little t) and yet mistake it for Truth (big T) brings nothing but discord and is as far from wisdom as one can get.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)